CHARLES MACCHIONE 16, 517, 120 lbs stripped. waist 25, chest 33.75" From Salt Lake City, Utah, Biceps 11.5" thighs 20". Chorles wants to be a railroad trainman when he grows up,

Likes swimming, horseback riding.

This is AMG photo X13-1 (X thirteen-eye).

Additional photos of Charles on pages 8 and 9 of catalog X1-13 30 cents (available after June 15, 1958)

NELSON age 11

eighs 110.. Being raised on o form in Tennessee, he gets lots of hard work and even if he never touches a weight or hears about a protein pill, will probably grow up to have a magnificent build. Commercial prints not available,

but please let Physique Pictorial know if you feel prints of such youthful subjects would have inspirational value to other young fellows.

Steve on pg 8 of Summer 56 OPP? He is now a Senior in high school and is on the wrestling team. The coach thinks he has a fine build, and encourages the use of weights. But Steve credits

most of his muscles to good old hard farm work.

Photo courtesy Ross Deaner Box 268 Somerset Penn.

......Letters from Readers. (FELLOW ILLITERATES, TAKE NOTICEI) "I would like to say a few words about the general style and t anti-censorship tirades. I do not know at which intelligence level you are directing these articles, but I would predict that they have effect on the lower strata of our social, educational, and financial orders. In 95% of these articles the judge is biased, the jurors are the lawyers are incompetent, the testimony is perjured, the arresting officers are perverted, and the punishment is crippling. Yet in ve any, of these editorials is there any absolute proof that the charges made by your editorial staff are true. Either the persecuted is a per of the PP editor or, due to the proximity of the trial to Los Angeles, it is inferred that PP had a supposedly unbiased observer at the trid is there sufficient identification of the particular case under question to allow interested parties to investigate the trial records and veri itorial charges for themselves. ....? Then too, your grammar, wording, and general editorial styles tract from the quality of the article. In short, your editorials cannot paint a very convincing picture of authenticity for the eyes of you highly educated and intelligent readers". J.E.S. Los Angeles 28, Calif.

Editor's note: Highly articulate J.E.S. has probably voiced here thoughts on many readers minds. PP's editor has no intention of being and hasnt the finances for an armored car and bodyguards, hence specific names are omitted in our "tirades", though such information available for responsible parties who can and will take effective action. Too, more than 90% of our magazines are distributed out of o area where such names would be unknown anyway and no effective good could be done by their publication. And again, in exposing we might bring embarrassment and unpleasantness to the innocent-and anyway, it is the sin and not the sinner that we despise. REGARDING OUR GRAMMAR. We attempt to use a progressive form of grammar, spelling and style--we hold the perhaps naive belie purpose of language is to express ideas-sometimes "rules" must be broken to do this effectively. Now we aren't trying to defend here ous typographical errors, occasional hideous misspellings that sometimes slip through, but the general tenor of our correspondence leads lieve that we are getting across to many, many thinking people. We dont mind at all having the strict grammarians point out our depar established rules, because we want to "break the rules" knowingly and not through ignorance, and unlike certain of our critics, we rea quite far from perfect. So when you think we've pulled a boner, please give us details of how you feel it should have been done.